I Despair at the Despair of Global Warming Alarmists!

Yes! Global Warming is happening! Even the best of the sceptics/deniers like Richard Linzden acknowledge this:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATqQ0F6wRjY

But when I see the rantings of the ranks of minimally informed Private Frazers out there (  http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=w7RIgs3eygo&NR=1  ) , it makes me despair. They pick up the catastrophe messages from what are no more than the prognostications of the AGW scientific community, via the IPCC press releases and then amplify, spin and distort these 'guesstimates' until there's no other sensible alternative to mass suicide.

Who knows? Maybe more good than harm will come from watching the mercury rise every year!
http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/11/30/matt-ridley-global-warming-could-be-good/#more-11553

Global Warming is not a Crisis - Please tell me this is True!!

How people long to be told that Global Warming is not a Crisis. This could not have been demonstrated more forcefully than in a debate called:

Global Warming is not a Crisis - one debate - 3 speakers for the motion - 3 speakers against the motion. Before the debate: the audience poll showed:  30% in favour - 57% against - 13% don't knows. After the debate the polled figures reversed:  46% in favour - 42% against - 12% don't knows. 

Many of those present were obviously swayed by the forcefulness of the protagonists’ emphasis on scientific uncertainty and demonstrated that their earlier opinions, formed from computer models with scary projections, were reactions to the hyperbole of alarmists. The same hyperbole was repeated by those against the motion but, with their palpable feet of clay, there was little conviction in what they had to say.http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=9082151 

For LFTRs, the enemy should be atmospheric pollution and particulates from the burning of fossil fuels, which are responsible for 2 million premature deaths per annum. Everyone can agree on such FACTS (more reliable than computer model projections involving unknowable positive feedbacks) and all our endeavours should be aimed at deploying clean energy sources.

See the heading to this Blog to get an instant perspective on the relative environmental degradation caused by energy supplied from - Coal - Uranium - Thorium.

Nick Griffin advocates LFTRs to EU Environmental Committee.

Way back on 19 April 2011, with a cerebral perception, removed from the peculiar racist part of his brain and, what seemed, a genuine concern for people with black skin subjected to increasing starvation caused by biofuel production, Nick Griffin promoted LFTRs.

http://www.eutimes.net/2011/04/nick-griffin-leaves-climate-change-eurocrats-speechless/

Whilst he dismissed Global Warming  he homed in on Peak Oil as the basis for EU consideration of LFTRs.

What a waste of a consumate communicator, to have a mind filled with protecting his nationalism (whatever that is), when he should be using all of that grey matter in the cause of promoting the technology to save all humanity.