Transportable by road, rail and water, this is how living with your district nuclear power facility will look - it's just another unit at the back of your Retail Park: SMRs - Now you can see just what it's going to look like!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ac99/7ac99b48f1fb83d173a233f9aa28db5d6a04ee7d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30a0c/30a0c819eaa119b01130f2b04839e0b42e38116a" alt=""
To generate electricity for a city of 1 million people for 1 year:___Mine 3,200,000 tonnes of coal - emit 8,500,000 tonnes of greenhouse gases and particulates - landfill 900,000 cubic metres of toxic/radioactive fly-ash.___OR___Mine 50,000 tonnes of uranium ore - emit no greenhouse gases - produce 24 tonnes of radiotoxic 'waste'.___OR___Mine 50 tonnes of equivalent thorium ore - emit no greenhouse gases - produce 0.8 tonnes of radiotoxic 'waste'.
I would note that you're post is somewhat at odds with the recent NNL position paper on SMR's. While they highlight several "niche" roles for the SMR to play, they are very clear that the represent a sacrificing of economies of scale and are thus likely to be more expensive per kWh than large LWR's.
ReplyDelete(google NNL position paper SMR)
I reached a similar conclusion some time ago also and discuss their article on my site.
http://daryanenergyblog.wordpress.com/2012/07/27/the-nnl-and-small-smrs/